<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<!-- xml2rfc v2 -->

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [

<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2629 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2629.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3552 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3552.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4443 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4443.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5095 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5095.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6550 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6550.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6551 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6551.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6554 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6554.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5826 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5826.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5867 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5867.xml">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>

<rfc category="exp" number="6998" ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF" consensus="yes">

  <front>

    <title abbrev="Measurement of Routing Metrics in LLNs">A Mechanism to
Measure the Routing Metrics along a Point-to-Point Route in a Low-Power and Lossy Network</title>

    <author fullname="Mukul Goyal" initials="M." surname="Goyal" role="editor">
            <organization abbrev="Univ. of Wisconsin Milwaukee">University of Wisconsin Milwaukee</organization>
            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>3200 N. Cramer St.</street>
                <city>Milwaukee</city>
                <region>WI</region>
                <code>53201</code>
                <country>USA</country>
              </postal>
              <phone>+1-414-229-5001</phone>
              <email>mukul@uwm.edu</email>
            </address>
    </author>

    <author initials="E." surname="Baccelli" fullname="Emmanuel Baccelli">
          <organization>INRIA</organization>
          <address>
          <phone>+33-169-335-511</phone>
          <email>Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr</email>
          <uri>http://www.emmanuelbaccelli.org/</uri>
          </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Anders Brandt" initials="A." surname="Brandt">
            <organization>Sigma Designs</organization>
            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>Emdrupvej 26A, 1.</street>
                <city>Copenhagen</city>
                <region>Dk-2100</region>
                <country>Denmark</country>
              </postal>
              <phone>+45-29609501</phone>
              <email>abr@sdesigns.dk</email>
            </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Jerald Martocci" initials="J." surname="Martocci">
            <organization>Johnson Controls</organization>
            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>507 E. Michigan Street</street>
                <city>Milwaukee</city>
                <region>WI</region>
                <code>53202</code>
                <country>USA</country>
              </postal>
              <phone>+1-414-524-4010</phone>
              <email>jerald.p.martocci@jci.com</email>
            </address>
    </author>

    <date month="August" year="2013" />

    <area>Routing</area>

    <workgroup>Internet Engineering Task Force</workgroup>

  <keyword>Measurement, Route Quality, P2P Routes, RPL, ROLL</keyword>

<!-- [rfced] FYI, we have used xml2rfc v2 (available from 
http://xml.resource.org) to convert this document to text. -->

<abstract>
        <t>This document specifies a mechanism that enables a
    Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (RPL) router to measure
    the aggregated values of given routing metrics along an existing route
    towards another RPL router, thereby allowing the router to decide if it
    wants to initiate the discovery of a better route.</t>
</abstract>

</front>

  <middle>
          <section title="Introduction">
                  <t>Point-to-point (P2P) communication between arbitrary routers in a Low-power and Lossy Network (LLN)
             is a key requirement for many home and commercial building
automation applications <xref
target="RFC5826"/> <xref target="RFC5867"/>.
             The IPv6 Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL) <xref target="RFC6550"/> constrains the
             LLN topology to a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) built to optimize the routing costs to reach the
             DAG's root. The P2P routing functionality, available under RPL, has the following key
             limitations:<list style="symbols">
                 <t>The P2P routes are restricted to use the DAG links only. Such P2P routes may
             potentially be suboptimal and may lead to traffic congestion near the DAG root.</t>
                 <t>RPL is a proactive routing protocol and hence requires that
all P2P routes be
             established ahead of the time they are used. Many LLN applications require
                 the ability to establish P2P routes "on demand".</t></list></t>

                  <t>To ameliorate situations where the core RPL's P2P routing functionality does not meet an
              application's requirements, <xref target="RFC6997"/> describes P2P&nbhy;RPL, an
             extension to core RPL. P2P&nbhy;RPL provides a reactive mechanism to discover P2P routes that meet
             the specified routing constraints <xref target="RFC6551"/>. In some cases,
             the application's requirements or the LLN's topological features allow a router to infer these
             routing constraints implicitly. For example, the application may
require that the end-to-end loss
             rate and/or latency along the route be below certain thresholds, or the LLN topology may be such
            that a router can safely assume that its destination is less than a certain number of hops away
             from itself.</t>

                 <t>When the existing routes are deemed unsatisfactory but the router does not implicitly know the
             routing constraints to be used in P2P&nbhy;RPL route discovery, it may be necessary for the router
             to measure the aggregated values of the routing metrics along the existing route. This knowledge
             will allow the router to frame reasonable routing constraints to discover a better route using
             P2P&nbhy;RPL. For example, if the router determines the aggregate
ETX (expected transmission count) <xref target="RFC6551"/> along an existing
route to be "x", it can use
             "ETX &lt; x*y", where y is a certain fraction, as the routing constraint for use in P2P&nbhy;RPL
             route discovery. Note that it is important that the routing constraints not be overly strict;
             otherwise, the P2P&nbhy;RPL route discovery may fail even though a route exists that is much better
            than the one currently being used.</t>

                <t>This document specifies a mechanism that enables a RPL router to measure the aggregated values of
            the routing metrics along an existing route to another RPL router in an LLN, thereby allowing
            the router to decide if it wants to discover a better route using P2P&nbhy;RPL and determine the
            routing constraints to be used for this purpose. Thus, the utility of this mechanism
            is dependent on the existence of P2P&nbhy;RPL <xref target="RFC6997"/>.
            The hope is that experiments with P2P&nbhy;RPL and the mechanism defined in this document will
            result in feedback on the utility and benefits of this document,
so that a Standards Track version of this document can then be developed.</t>
               
<section title="Terminology">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",
                "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>

        <t>Additionally, this document uses terminology from <xref target="RFC6550"/>, <xref
target="RFC6554"/>, and <xref target="RFC6997"/>. Further terminology may be
found in <xref target="ROLL-TERMS"/>. This document defines the following terms:</t>

     <t><list style="hanging">
       <t hangText="Start Point:">The RPL router that initiates the measurement
process defined in this document and that is the start point of the P2P route being measured.</t>

        <t hangText="End Point:">The RPL router at the end point of the P2P route being measured.</t>

        <t hangText="Intermediate Point:">A RPL router, other than the Start
Point and the End Point, on the P2P route being measured.</t>
     </list></t>

        <t>The following terms, as already defined in <xref target="RFC6997"/>,
are redefined in this document in the following manner:</t>

    <t><list style="hanging">
        <t hangText="Forward direction:">The direction from the Start Point to the End Point.</t>
        <t hangText="Reverse direction:">The direction from the End Point to the Start Point.</t>
     </list></t>

</section>
</section>

<section anchor="func" title="Overview">
        <t>The mechanism described in this document can be used by a Start Point in an LLN to measure the aggregated values of selected routing metrics
                along a P2P route to an End Point within the LLN. The route is measured in the Forward direction. Such a route
                could be a Source Route or a Hop-by-hop Route established
                using RPL <xref target="RFC6550"/> or P2P&nbhy;RPL <xref target="RFC6997"/>. Such a route could also be a "mixed"
                route, with the initial part consisting of hop-by-hop ascent to the root of a non-storing DAG <xref target="RFC6550"/> and the final
               part consisting of a source-routed descent to the End Point. The Start Point decides what metrics to measure and
               sends a Measurement Request message, carrying the desired routing metric objects, along the route. If a Source Route
               is being measured, the Measurement Request carries the route inside an Address vector. If a Hop-by-hop Route is being measured, the
               Measurement Request identifies the route by its RPLInstanceID <xref target="RFC6550"/> (and, if the RPLInstanceID is a local value,
              the Start Point's IPv6 address associated with the route). On receiving a Measurement Request,
                an Intermediate Point updates the routing metric values inside the message and forwards it to the next hop on the route. Thus, the
                Measurement Request accumulates the values of the routing metrics for the complete route as it travels towards the End Point.
                Upon receiving the Measurement Request, the End Point unicasts a Measurement Reply message, carrying the accumulated values of
                the routing metrics, back to the Start Point. Optionally, the Start Point may allow an Intermediate Point to generate the Measurement
               Reply if the Intermediate Point already knows the relevant
routing metric values along the rest of the route.</t> 

       <t>The Measurement Request may include an Address vector that serves one of the following functions:<list style="symbols">
                       <t>To accumulate a Source Route for the End Point's use: If a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID is being measured, the
                   Start Point may require that each Intermediate Point add its global or unique-local IPv6 address to an Address vector inside the
                   Measurement Request. The Source Route, thus accumulated, can be used by the End Point to reach the Start Point. In particular,
                  the End Point may use the accumulated Source Route to send the Measurement Reply back to the Start Point. In this case, the Start Point
                   includes a suitably sized Address vector in the Measurement Request. The size of the Address vector puts a hard limit on
                   the length of the accumulated route. An Intermediate Point is not allowed to modify the size of the Address vector and
                   must discard a received Measurement Request if the Address vector is not large enough to contain the complete route.</t> 
                       <t>To carry the Source Route being measured: The Start Point may insert an Address vector inside the Measurement Request
                   to carry the Source Route being measured. Also, the root of a global non-storing DAG may insert an Address vector,
                   carrying a Source Route from itself to the End Point, inside a Measurement Request message if this message had been
                   traveling along this DAG so far. This Source Route must consist of global or unique-local IPv6 addresses. An Intermediate Point
                   is not allowed to modify an existing Address vector before forwarding the Measurement Request further. In other words, an
                  Intermediate Point must not modify the Source Route along which the Measurement Request is currently traveling.</t>
      </list></t>

</section>

<section anchor="measurement" title="The Measurement Object (MO)">

<t>This document defines two new RPL control message types: the Measurement Object (MO), with code 0x06; and the Secure MO, with code 0x86. An MO
        serves as both Measurement Request and Measurement Reply.</t>

<section anchor="baseMO" title="Format of the Base MO">

<figure anchor="measurement-fig" align="center" title="Format of the Base Measurement Object
(MO)"> <artwork>
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | RPLInstanceID | Compr |T|H|A|R|B|I|   SeqNo   |  Num  | Index |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   .                       Start Point Address                     .
   .                                                               .
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   .                       End Point Address                       .
   .                                                               .
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   .                       Address[0..Num-1]                       .
   .                                                               .
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   .                   Metric Container Option(s)                  .
   .                                                               .
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork> </figure>


<t>The format of a base MO is shown in <xref target="measurement-fig"/>. A base MO consists of the following fields:
        <list style="symbols">
                <t>RPLInstanceID: This field specifies the RPLInstanceID of the Hop-by-hop Route along which the Measurement Request travels (or traveled
            initially until it switched over to a Source Route).</t>
                <t>Compr: In many LLN deployments, IPv6 addresses share a
well-known, common prefix. In such cases, the
            common prefix can be elided when specifying IPv6 addresses in the Start Point/End Point Address fields and
            the Address vector. The "Compr" field, a 4-bit unsigned integer, is set by the Start Point to specify
            the number of prefix octets that are elided from the IPv6 addresses in Start Point/End Point Address fields
            and the Address vector. The Start Point will set the Compr value to zero if full IPv6 addresses are to
                       be carried in the Start Point Address/End Point Address fields and the Address vector.</t>
               <t>Type (T): This flag is set to one if the MO represents a Measurement Request. The flag is set to zero if the MO is a Measurement Reply.</t>
               <t>Hop-by-hop (H): The Start Point MUST set this flag to one if (at least the initial part of) the route being measured
                       is hop by hop. 

In that case, the Hop-by-hop Route is identified by the RPLInstanceID, the End Point Address, and, if the
                       RPLInstanceID is a local value, the Start Point Address fields inside the Measurement Request. Here, the Start Point Address
                       field is required to be the same as the DODAGID (the
identifier of the Destination-Oriented DAG (DODAG) root) <xref
target="RFC6550"/> of the route being measured.
 The Start Point MUST set the H flag to zero if the route being measured is a Source Route specified
                      in the Address vector. An Intermediate Point MUST set the
H flag in an outgoing Measurement Request to the same value that it had in
                      the corresponding incoming Measurement Request, except
under the following circumstance: If the Intermediate Point is the root
of the non-storing global DAG along which the Measurement Request
had been traveling so far and it intends to insert a Source Route inside the
Address vector to direct the Measurement Request towards the End Point,
then it MUST set the H flag to zero.</t>

                <t>Accumulate Route (A): A value of 1 in this flag indicates that the Measurement Request is accumulating a Source Route for use by
            the End Point to send the Measurement Reply back to the Start Point. Route accumulation MUST NOT be used (i.e., this flag MUST NOT be
            set to one) inside a Measurement Request, unless it travels along a
Hop-by-hop Route represented by a local RPLInstanceID (i.e., H = 1 and
            RPLInstanceID has a local value). Route accumulation MAY be used (i.e., this flag MAY be set to one) if the Measurement Request is traveling
            along a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID. In this case, if the route accumulation is on, an Intermediate Point adds its
                       unicast global/unique-local IPv6 address (after eliding Compr number of prefix octets) to the Address vector in the manner specified in
            <xref target="intermedLocalAccuOn"/>. In other cases, this flag MUST be set to zero on transmission and ignored on reception.
            Route accumulation is not allowed when the Measurement Request travels along a Hop-by-hop Route with a global RPLInstanceID, i.e.,
                       along a global DAG, because: <list style="symbols">
                 <t>The DAG's root may need the Address vector to insert a Source Route to the End Point; and</t>
                 <t>The End Point can presumably reach the Start Point along this global DAG (identified by the RPLInstanceID
                     field).</t></list></t>
             <t>Reverse (R): A value of 1 in this flag inside a Measurement Request indicates that the Address vector contains a complete Source
                     Route from the Start Point to the End Point, which can be used, after reversal, by the End Point to send the Measurement Reply
                     back to the Start Point. This flag MAY be set to one inside a Measurement Request only if a Source Route, from the Start Point
                    to the End Point, is being measured. Otherwise, this flag MUST be set to zero on transmission and ignored on reception.</t>
            <t>Back Request (B): A value of 1 in this flag serves as a request to the End Point to send a Measurement Request towards
                    the Start Point. On receiving a Measurement Request with the B flag set to one, the End Point SHOULD generate a
                    Measurement Request to measure the cost of its current (or the most preferred) route to the Start Point. Receipt
                    of this Measurement Request would allow the Start Point to know the cost of the back route from the End Point to itself
                    and thus determine the round-trip cost of reaching the End Point.</t>
            <t>Intermediate Reply (I): A value of 1 in this flag serves as permission to an Intermediate Point to generate a Measurement Reply
                    if it knows the aggregated values of the routing metrics being measured for the rest of the route. Setting this flag to one
                    may be useful in scenarios where the Hop Count <xref target="RFC6551"/> is the routing metric of interest and an Intermediate
                    Point (e.g., the root of a non-storing global DAG or a common ancestor of the Start Point and the End Point in a storing global DAG)
                    may know the Hop Count of the remainder of the route to the End Point. This flag MAY be set to one only if a Hop-by-hop Route with a
                    global RPLInstanceID is being measured (i.e., H = 1 and RPLInstanceID has a global value). Otherwise, this flag MUST be set to zero on
                   transmission and ignored on reception.</t>
           <t>SeqNo: This is a 6-bit sequence number, assigned by the Start Point, that allows the Start Point to uniquely
                   identify a Measurement Request and the corresponding Measurement Reply.</t>
          <t>Num: This field indicates the number of elements, each (16 - Compr) octets in size, inside the Address vector. If the value of
                  this field is zero, the Address vector is not present in the MO.</t>
          <t>Index: If the Measurement Request is traveling along a Source Route contained in the Address vector (i.e., H = 0), this field indicates
                 the index in the Address vector of the next hop on the route. If the Measurement Request is traveling along a Hop-by-hop Route with a local
                 RPLInstanceID and the route accumulation is on (i.e., H = 1,
RPLInstanceID has a local value, and A = 1), this field indicates the index
                 in the Address vector where an Intermediate Point receiving the Measurement Request must store its IPv6 address. Otherwise, this field
                MUST be set to zero on transmission and ignored on reception.</t>
        <t>Start Point Address: This is a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the Start Point after eliding Compr number of prefix octets. If
             the Measurement Request is traveling along a Hop-by-hop Route and the RPLInstanceID field indicates a local value, the
             Start Point Address field MUST specify the DODAGID value that, along with the RPLInstanceID and the End Point Address,
             uniquely identifies the Hop-by-hop Route being measured.</t>
     <t>End Point Address: This is a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the End Point after eliding Compr number of prefix octets.</t>
     <t>Address[0..Num-1]: This field is a vector of unicast global or
unique-local IPv6 addresses (with Compr number of prefix octets elided) representing a Source Route:
             <list style="symbols">
                   <t>Each element in the vector has size (16 - Compr) octets.</t>
                   <t>The total number of elements inside the Address vector is given by the Num field.</t>
                   <t>The Start Point and End Point addresses MUST NOT be included in the Address vector.</t>
                  <t>The Address vector MUST NOT contain any multicast addresses.</t>
                   <t>If the Start Point wants to measure a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID and accumulate
                       a Source Route for the End Point's use (i.e., the Measurement Request has the H flag set to one, RPLInstanceID
                       set to a local value, and the A flag set to one), it MUST include a suitably sized Address vector in the Measurement
                       Request. As the Measurement Request travels over the route being measured, the Address vector accumulates a Source
                       Route that can be used by the End Point, after reversal, to reach (and, in particular, to send the Measurement Reply
                       back to) the Start Point. The route MUST be accumulated in the Forward direction, but the IPv6 addresses in the
                       accumulated route MUST be reachable in the Reverse direction. An Intermediate Point MUST add only a global or unique-local
                      IPv6 address to the Address vector and MUST NOT modify the size of the Address vector.</t>
                  <t>If the Start Point wants to measure a Source Route, it MUST include an Address vector, containing the
                      route being measured, inside the Measurement Request. Similarly, if the Measurement Request had been traveling
                      along a global non-storing DAG so far, the root of this DAG may insert an Address vector, containing a Source Route
                      from itself to the End Point, inside the Measurement Request. In both cases, the Source Route inside the Address
                      vector MUST consist only of global or unique-local IPv6 addresses that are reachable in the Forward direction. Further,
                      in both cases, an Intermediate Point MUST NOT modify the contents of the existing Address vector before forwarding
                      the Measurement Request further. In other words, an Intermediate Point MUST NOT modify the Source Route along which
                      the Measurement Request is currently traveling. The Start Point MAY set the R flag in the Measurement Request to one
                      if the Source Route inside the Address vector can be used by the End Point, after reversal, to reach (and, in particular,
                      to send the Measurement Reply back to) the Start Point. In other words, the Start Point MAY set the R flag to one only if
                     all the IPv6 addresses in the Address vector are reachable in the Reverse direction.</t>
             </list></t>
             <t>Metric Container Options: A Measurement Request MUST contain one or more Metric Container options <xref target="RFC6550"/> to
                     accumulate the values of the selected routing metrics in the manner described in <xref target="RFC6551"/> for the route being
                     measured.</t></list><xref target="originatingMO"/> describes how a Start Point sets various fields inside a Measurement
     Request in different cases. <xref target="processingIntermediate"/> describes how an Intermediate Point processes a received Measurement
     Request before forwarding it further. <xref target="processingEndPoint"/> describes how the End Point processes a received Measurement Request
     and generates a Measurement Reply. Finally, <xref target="processingStartPoint"/> describes how the Start Point processes a received Measurement
     Reply. In the following discussion, any reference to discarding a received Measurement Request/Reply with "no further processing"
    does not preclude updating the appropriate error counters or any similar actions.</t>
</section>

<section anchor="secureMO" title="Secure MO">

        <t>A Secure MO follows the format shown in Figure 7 of <xref target="RFC6550"/>, where the base format is the base MO shown in
                <xref target="measurement-fig"/>. Sections 6.1, 10, and 19 of
<xref target="RFC6550"/> describe the RPL security framework.
                These sections are applicable to the use of Secure MO messages as well, except as constrained in this section. An LLN deployment
                MUST support the use of Secure MO messages so that it has the ability to invoke RPL-provided security mechanisms and prevent misuse of
               the measurement mechanism by unauthorized routers.</t>

       <t>The Start Point determines whether Secure MO messages are to be used in a particular route measurement and, if yes, the Security Configuration
               (see definition in <xref target="RFC6997"/>) to be used for that purpose. The Start Point MUST NOT set the "Key Identifier
               Mode" field to a value of 1 inside this Security Configuration, since this setting indicates the use of a per-pair key, which is not suitable for
               securing the Measurement Request messages that travel over multiple hops. A router (an Intermediate Point or the End Point) participating
              in a particular route measurement<list style="symbols">
                      <t>MUST generate a Secure MO message (a Measurement Request or a Measurement Reply) if the received Measurement Request is a Secure
                 MO. The Security Configuration used in generating a Secure MO
message MUST be the same as the one used in the received
                   message.</t>
                       <t>MUST NOT generate a Secure MO message if the received Measurement Request is not a Secure MO.</t></list>
               A router MUST discard a received Measurement Request if it cannot follow the above-mentioned rules. If the Start Point sends a Measurement
               Request in a Secure MO message using a particular Security Configuration, it MUST discard the corresponding Measurement Reply it receives
               with no further processing, unless the Measurement Reply is
received in a Secure MO message generated with the same Security Configuration as the
              one used in the Measurement Request.</t>

       
      <t>In the following discussion, any reference to an MO message is also applicable to a Secure MO message, unless noted otherwise.</t>

</section>
</section>

<section anchor="originatingMO" title="Originating a Measurement Request">

        <t>A Start Point sets various fields inside the Measurement Request it generates in the manner described below.
                The Start Point MUST also include the routing metric objects <xref target="RFC6551"/> of interest inside one or more Metric
                Container options inside the Measurement Request. The Start Point then determines the next hop on the route being measured. If
               a Hop-by-hop Route is being measured (i.e., H = 1), the next hop is determined using the RPLInstanceID, the End Point
               Address, and, if RPLInstanceID is a local value, the Start Point Address fields in the Measurement Request. If a Source Route
               is being measured (i.e., H = 0), the Address[0] element inside
the Measurement Request contains the next-hop address.
The Start Point MUST ensure that <list style="symbols">
                    <t>the next-hop address is a unicast address, and</t>
                    <t>the next hop is on-link, and</t>
                    <t>the next hop is in the same RPL routing domain <xref target="RFC6554"/> as the Start Point,</t></list>

               failing which the Start Point MUST discard the Measurement Request without sending.
            Depending on the routing metrics, the Start Point must initiate the routing metric objects inside the Metric Container
            options by including the routing metric values for the first hop on the route being measured. Finally, the Start Point MUST unicast the
           Measurement Request to the next hop on the route being measured.</t>

   <t>The Start Point MUST maintain state for a just-transmitted Measurement Request, for a lifetime duration that is large enough to allow the
           corresponding Measurement Reply to return. This state consists of
the RPLInstanceID, the SeqNo, and the End Point Address fields of
           the Measurement Request. The lifetime duration for this state is locally determined by the Start Point and may be deployment
           specific. This state expires when the corresponding Measurement Reply is received or when the lifetime is over, whichever occurs first.
           Failure to receive the corresponding Measurement Reply before the
expiry of a state may occur due to a number of reasons, including the
           unwillingness on the part of an Intermediate Point or the End Point to process the Measurement Request. The Start Point should take such
           possibilities into account when deciding whether to generate another Measurement Request for this route. The Start Point MUST discard a
          received Measurement Reply with no further processing if the state for the corresponding Measurement Request has already expired.</t> 

       <section title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Global RPLInstanceID">

               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a global RPLInstanceID is being
measured (i.e., H = 1 and RPLInstanceID has a global value), the MO MUST NOT
                      contain an Address vector, and various MO fields MUST be set in the following manner:
                       <list style="symbols">
                   <t>RPLInstanceID: This field MUST be set to the RPLInstanceID of the route being measured.</t>
                   <t>Compr: This field MUST be set to specify the number of prefix octets that are elided from the IPv6 addresses in
                       Start Point/End Point Address fields.</t> 
                   <t>Type (T): This flag MUST be set to one, since the MO represents a Measurement Request.</t>
                   <t>Hop-by-hop (H): This flag MUST be set to one.</t>
                   <t>Accumulate Route (A): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Reverse (R): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Back Request (B): This flag MAY be set to one to request
that the End Point send a Measurement Request to the Start Point.
                   </t>
                   <t>Intermediate Reply (I): This flag MAY be set to one if the Start Point expects an Intermediate Point to know the  
                       values of the routing metrics being measured for the remainder of the route.</t>
                   <t>SeqNo: This is assigned by the Start Point so that it can uniquely identify the Measurement Request and the
                      corresponding Measurement Reply.</t>
                   <t>Num: This field MUST be set to zero.</t>
                  <t>Index: This field MUST be set to zero.</t>
                  <t>Start Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global/unique-local IPv6 address of the Start Point after eliding Compr number of prefix octets. 
                  </t>
                  <t>End Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global/unique-local IPv6 address of the End Point after eliding Compr number of prefix octets.
                  </t>
               </list></t>

       </section>

       <section title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Local RPLInstanceID with Route Accumulation Off">

               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID is being measured and the Start Point does not want the
                       MO to accumulate a Source Route for the End Point's use, the MO MUST NOT contain the Address vector, and
                      various MO fields MUST be set in the following manner:<list style="symbols">
                   <t>RPLInstanceID: This field MUST be set to the RPLInstanceID of the route being measured.</t>
                   <t>Compr: This field MUST be set to specify the number of prefix octets that are elided from the IPv6 addresses in
                       Start Point/End Point Address fields.</t> 
                   <t>Type (T): This flag MUST be set to one, since the MO represents a Measurement Request.</t>
                   <t>Hop-by-hop (H): This flag MUST be set to one.</t>
                   <t>Accumulate Route (A): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Reverse (R): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Back Request (B): This flag MAY be set to one to request
that the End Point send a Measurement Request to the Start Point.
                   </t>
                   <t>Intermediate Reply (I): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>SeqNo: This is assigned by the Start Point so that it can uniquely identify the Measurement Request and the
                      corresponding Measurement Reply.</t>
                   <t>Num: This field MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Index: This field MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Start Point Address: This field MUST contain the DODAGID value (after eliding Compr number of prefix octets)
                       associated with the route being measured. This DODAGID MUST also be a global or unique-local IPv6 address of the
                   Start Point.</t>
                       <t>End Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the End Point after eliding Compr number of
                  prefix octets.</t>
               </list></t>
       </section>

       <section title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Local RPLInstanceID with Route Accumulation On">
               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID is being measured and the Start Point desires the MO
                       to accumulate a Source Route for the End Point to send the Measurement Reply message back, the MO MUST contain a suitably sized
                       Address vector, and various MO fields MUST be set in the following manner:<list style="symbols">
                   <t>RPLInstanceID: This field MUST be set to the RPLInstanceID of the route being measured.</t>
                   <t>Compr: This field MUST be set to specify the number of prefix octets that are elided from the IPv6 addresses in
                       Start Point/End Point Address fields and the Address vector.</t> 
                   <t>Type (T): This flag MUST be set to one, since the MO represents a Measurement Request.</t>
                   <t>Hop-by-hop (H): This flag MUST be set to one.</t>
                   <t>Accumulate Route (A): This flag MUST be set to one.</t>
                   <t>Reverse (R): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Back Request (B): This flag MAY be set to one to request
that the End Point send a Measurement Request to the Start Point.
                   </t>
                   <t>Intermediate Reply (I): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>SeqNo: This is assigned by the Start Point so that it can uniquely identify the Measurement Request and the
                      corresponding Measurement Reply.</t>
                  <t>Num: This field MUST specify the number of address elements, each (16 - Compr) octets in size, that can fit inside the
                     Address vector.</t>     
                   <t>Index: This field MUST be set to zero to indicate the position in the Address vector where the next hop must store its
                       IPv6 address.</t>
                   <t>Start Point Address: This field MUST contain the DODAGID value (after eliding Compr number of prefix octets)
                      associated with the route being measured. This DODAGID MUST also be a global or unique-local IPv6 address of the
                   Start Point.</t>
                       <t>End Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the End Point after eliding Compr
                  number of prefix octets.</t>
                  <t>Address vector: The Address vector must be large enough to accommodate a complete Source Route from the End Point to
                     the Start Point. All the bits in the Address vector field MUST be set to zero.</t>
               </list></t>

       </section>

       <section title="When Measuring a Source Route">

               <t>If a Source Route is being measured, the Start Point MUST set various MO fields in the following manner:<list style="symbols">
                   <t>RPLInstanceID: This field does not have any significance when a Source Route is being measured and hence can be set to any value.</t>
                   <t>Compr: This field MUST be set to specify the number of prefix octets that are elided from the IPv6 addresses in
                       Start Point/End Point Address fields and the Address vector.</t> 
                   <t>Type (T): This flag MUST be set to one, since the MO represents a Measurement Request.</t>
                   <t>Hop-by-hop (H): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Accumulate Route (A): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Reverse (R): This flag SHOULD be set to one if the Source Route in the Address vector can be reversed and
                       used by the End Point to send the Measurement Reply message back to the Start Point. Otherwise,
                       this flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>Back Request (B): This flag MAY be set to one to request
that the End Point send a Measurement Request to the Start Point.
                   </t>
                   <t>Intermediate Reply (I): This flag MUST be set to zero.</t>
                   <t>SeqNo: This is assigned by the Start Point so that it can uniquely identify the Measurement Request and the
                      corresponding Measurement Reply.</t>
                  <t>Num: This field MUST specify the number of address elements, each (16 - Compr) octets in size, inside the
                     Address vector.</t>     
                 <t>Index: This field MUST be set to zero to indicate the position in the Address vector of the next hop on the route.</t>
                 <t>Start Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the Start Point after eliding Compr
                    number of prefix octets.</t>
                <t>End Point Address: This field MUST be set to a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address of the End Point after eliding Compr number
                   of prefix octets.</t>
               <t>Address vector: <list style="symbols">
                   <t>The Address vector MUST contain a complete Source Route from the Start Point to the End Point
                      (excluding the Start Point and the End Point).</t>
                  <t>Each address appearing in the Address vector MUST be a unicast global or unique-local IPv6 address. Further, each
                      address MUST have the same prefix as the Start Point Address and the End Point Address. This prefix, whose length
                     in octets is specified in the Compr field, MUST be elided from each address.</t>
                  <t>The IPv6 addresses in the Address vector MUST be reachable in the Forward direction.</t>
                  <t>If the R flag is set to one, the IPv6 addresses in the Address vector MUST also be reachable in the Reverse direction.</t>
             </list></t>
       </list></t>

       </section>

</section>

<section anchor="processingIntermediate" title="Processing a Measurement Request at an Intermediate Point">

        <t>A router (an Intermediate Point or the End Point) MAY discard a
received MO with no processing, in order
                to meet any policy-related goals. Such policy goals may include the need to reduce the router's
               CPU load, or to enhance its battery life, or to prevent the misuse of this mechanism by unauthorized nodes.</t>

       <t>A router MUST discard a received MO with no further processing if the value in the Compr field inside the received
               message is more than what the router considers to be the length of the common prefix used in IPv6 addresses
              in the LLN.</t>

       <t>On receiving an MO, if a router chooses to process the packet
further, it MUST determine whether or not one of its IPv6
               addresses is listed as either the Start Point or the End Point Address. If not, the router considers itself
              an Intermediate Point and MUST process the received MO in the following manner.</t>

      <t>An Intermediate Point MUST discard the packet with no further processing if the received MO is not a
              Measurement Request (i.e., T = 0). This is because the End Point unicasts a Measurement Reply directly to the Start Point. So,
              the Intermediate Point treats a transiting Measurement Reply as a data packet and not a RPL control message.</t>

     <t>Next, the Intermediate Point determines the type of the route being measured (by checking the values of the H flag and the RPLInstanceID field)
             and processes the received MO accordingly, in the manner specified next.</t>

       <section title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Global RPLInstanceID">

               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a global RPLInstanceID is being
measured (i.e., H = 1 and RPLInstanceID has a global value), the Intermediate
                       Point MUST process the received Measurement Request in the following manner.</t>

               <t>If the Num field inside the received Measurement Request is not set to zero, thereby implying that an Address vector is present,
                       the Intermediate Point MUST discard the received message with no further processing.</t> 

               <t>If the Intermediate Reply (I) flag is set to one in the
received Measurement Request and the Intermediate Point knows the values
                       of the routing metrics (as specified in the Metric
Container options) for the remainder of the route, it MAY generate a
Measurement Reply on the End Point's behalf in the manner specified
in <xref target="genReply"/> (after including in the Measurement
                       Reply the relevant routing metric values for the
complete route being measured). Otherwise, the Intermediate Point MUST process
the received message in the following manner.</t> 

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST determine the next hop on the route being measured using the RPLInstanceID and the End Point Address.
                       If the Intermediate Point is the root of the non-storing global DAG along which the received Measurement Request had been traveling
                       so far, it MUST process the received Measurement Request in the following manner: <list style="symbols">
                   <t>If the router does not know how to reach the End Point, it MUST discard the Measurement Request with no further
                       processing and MAY send an ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable (with Code 0 -- No Route To Destination) error message
                       <xref target="RFC4443"/> to the Start Point.</t>
                  <t>Otherwise, unless the router determines the End Point itself to be the next hop, the router MUST make the following
                      changes in the received Measurement Request:<list style="symbols">
                  <t>Set the H, A, R, and I flags to zero (the A and R flags should already be zero in the received message).</t>
                  <t>Leave the remaining fields unchanged (the Num field would
be modified in the next steps). Note that
                          the RPLInstanceID field identifies the non-storing global DAG along which the Measurement Request
                          traveled so far. This information MUST be preserved so that the End Point may use this DAG to send
                          the Measurement Reply back to the Start Point.</t>
                  <t>Insert a new Address vector inside the Measurement
Request, and specify a Source Route to the End Point inside the
Address vector as per the following rules:<list style="symbols">
                                  <t>The Address vector MUST contain a complete route from the router to the End Point
                          (excluding the router and the End Point).</t>
                                  <t>Each address appearing in the Address vector MUST be a unicast global or unique-local
                          IPv6 address. Further, each address MUST have the same prefix as the Start Point
                          Address and the End Point Address. This prefix, whose length in octets is specified
                         in the Compr field, MUST be elided from each address.</t>
                                  <t>The IPv6 addresses in the Address vector MUST be reachable in the Forward direction.</t>
                          </list>
                          If the router cannot insert an Address vector satisfying the rules mentioned above,
                          it MUST discard the Measurement Request with no further processing and MAY send an ICMPv6
                          Destination Unreachable (with Code 0 -- No Route To Destination) error message <xref target="RFC4443"/>
                         to the Start Point.</t>
                  <t>Specify in the Num field the number of address elements in the Address vector.</t>
                  <t>Set the Index field to zero to indicate the position in the Address vector of the next hop on the route.
                         Thus, the Address[0] element contains the address of the next hop on the route.</t>
                </list></t>
               </list></t>

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST then complete the processing of the received Measurement Request as specified in <xref target="final"/>.
               </t>
       </section>

       <section title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Local RPLInstanceID with Route Accumulation Off">

               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID is being
measured and the route accumulation is off (i.e., H = 1, RPLInstanceID
                      has a local value, and A = 0), the Intermediate Point MUST process the received Measurement Request in the following manner.</t>

               <t>If the Num field inside the received Measurement Request is not set to zero, thereby implying that an Address vector is present,
                       the Intermediate Point MUST discard the received message with no further processing.</t> 

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST then determine the next hop on the route being measured using the RPLInstanceID, the End Point Address,
                       and the Start Point Address (which represents the DODAGID of the route being measured). If the Intermediate Point cannot
                       determine the next hop, it MUST discard the Measurement Request with no further processing and MAY send an ICMPv6 Destination
                       Unreachable (with Code 0 -- No Route To Destination) error message <xref target="RFC4443"/> to the Start Point. Otherwise, the
                      Intermediate Point MUST complete the processing of the received Measurement Request as specified in <xref target="final"/>.</t>

       </section>

       <section anchor="intermedLocalAccuOn" title="When Measuring a Hop-by-Hop Route with a Local RPLInstanceID with Route Accumulation On">

               <t>If a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID is being
measured and the route accumulation is on (i.e., H = 1, RPLInstanceID has
                      a local value, and A = 1), the Intermediate Point MUST process the received Measurement Request in the following manner.</t>

               <t>If the Num field inside the received Measurement Request is set to zero, thereby implying that an Address vector is not present,
                       the Intermediate Point MUST discard the received message with no further processing.</t> 

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST then determine the next hop on the route being measured using the RPLInstanceID, the End Point Address,
                       and the Start Point Address (which represents the DODAGID of the route being measured). If the Intermediate Point cannot
                       determine the next hop, it MUST discard the Measurement Request with no further processing and MAY send an ICMPv6 Destination
                       Unreachable (with Code 0 -- No Route To Destination) error message <xref target="RFC4443"/> to the Start Point. If the index field
                       has value Num - 1 and the next hop is not the same as the End Point, the Intermediate Point MUST drop the received Measurement Request
                       with no further processing. In this case, the next hop would have no space left in the Address vector to store its address.
                       Otherwise, the router MUST store one of its IPv6 addresses at location Address[Index] and then increment the Index field. The IPv6
                      address added to the Address vector MUST have the following properties: <list style="symbols">
                  <t>This address MUST be a unicast global or unique-local address.</t>
                  <t>This address MUST have the same prefix as the Start Point Address and the End Point Address. This prefix, whose length in
                      octets is specified in the Compr field, MUST be elided before the address is added to the Address vector.</t>
                  <t>This address MUST be reachable in the Reverse direction.</t>
                      </list>If the router does not have an IPv6 address that satisfies the properties mentioned above, it MUST discard the Measurement
                      Request with no further processing.</t>

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST then complete the processing of the received Measurement Request as specified in <xref target="final"/>.
               </t>

       </section>

     <section title="When Measuring a Source Route">

             <t>If a Source Route is being measured (i.e., H = 0), the Intermediate Point MUST process the received Measurement Request in the
                    following manner.</t>

               <t>If the Num field inside the received Measurement Request is set to zero, thereby implying that an Address vector is not present,
                       the Intermediate Point MUST discard the received message with no further processing.</t> 

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST verify that the Address[Index] element lists one of its unicast global or unique-local IPv6 addresses (minus
                       the prefix whose length in octets is specified in the Compr field), failing which it MUST
                      discard the Measurement Request with no further processing. The Intermediate Point MUST then increment the Index field
                       and use the Address[Index] element as the next hop
(unless the Index value is now Num). If the Index value is now Num, the
                      Intermediate Point MUST use the End Point Address as the next hop.</t>

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST then complete the processing of the received Measurement Request as specified in <xref target="final"/>.
               </t>
      </section>

     <section anchor="final" title="Final Processing">

               <t>The Intermediate Point MUST drop the received Measurement Request with no further processing:<list style="symbols">
                    <t>if the next-hop address is not a unicast address; or</t>
                    <t>if the next hop is not on-link; or</t>
                    <t>if the next hop is not in the same RPL routing domain as the Intermediate Point.</t></list></t>

    <t>Next, the Intermediate Point MUST update the routing metric objects, inside the Metric Container option(s) inside the Measurement Request,
            either by updating the aggregated value for the routing metric or by attaching the local values for the metric inside the object. An
            Intermediate Point can only update the existing metric objects and MUST NOT add any new routing metric objects to the Metric Container.
            An Intermediate Point MUST drop the Measurement Request with no further processing if it cannot update a routing metric object specified
           inside the Metric Container.</t>

   <t>Finally, the Intermediate Point MUST unicast the Measurement Request to the next hop.</t>
      </section>
      </section>

<section anchor="processingEndPoint" title="Processing a Measurement Request at the End Point">

        <t>On receiving an MO, if a router chooses to process the message further and finds one of its unicast global or unique-local IPv6 addresses
                (minus the prefix whose length in octets is specified in the Compr field) listed as the End Point Address, the router considers itself
               the End Point and MUST process the received MO in the following manner.</t>

        <t>The End Point MUST discard the received message with no further processing if it is not a Measurement Request (i.e., T = 0).</t>

        <t>If the received Measurement Request traveled on a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID with route accumulation on
                (i.e., H = 1, RPLInstanceID has a local value, and A = 1), elements Address[0] through Address[Index - 1] in the Address vector
                contain a complete Source Route from the Start Point to the End Point, which the End Point MAY use, after reversal, to reach the
                Start Point. Note that the Source Route in the Address vector
does not include the Start Point and the End Point addresses, and that the
               individual addresses do not include the common prefix whose length in octets is specified in the Compr field.</t>

       <t>If the received Measurement Request traveled on a Source Route and
the Reverse flag is set to one (i.e., H = 0 and R = 1), elements
               Address[0] through Address[Num - 1] in the Address vector contain a complete Source Route from the Start Point to the End Point,
               which the End Point MAY use, after reversal, to reach the Start Point. Again, the Source Route in the Address vector does not
               include the Start Point and the End Point addresses, and the individual addresses do not include the common prefix whose length in
              octets is specified in the Compr field.</t>

        <t>The End Point MUST update the routing metric objects in the Metric Container options if required and MAY note the
                measured values for the complete route (especially if the received Measurement Request is likely a response to
                an earlier Measurement Request that the End Point had sent to
the Start Point with the B flag set to one).</t>

        <t>The End Point MUST generate a Measurement Reply message as specified in <xref target="genReply"/>. If the B flag is set to one
                in the received Measurement Request, the End Point SHOULD generate a new Measurement Request to measure the cost of its
                current (or the most preferred) route to the Start Point. The routing metrics used in the new Measurement Request MUST
               include the routing metrics specified in the received Measurement Request.</t>

       <section anchor="genReply" title="Generating the Measurement Reply">

               <t>A Measurement Reply MUST have the Type (T) flag set to zero and need not contain the Address vector. The following fields inside a
                       Measurement Reply MUST have the same values as they had inside the corresponding Measurement Request: RPLInstanceID, Compr,
                       SeqNo, Start Point Address, End Point Address, and
Metric Container option(s). The remaining fields inside a Measurement
                       Reply may have any value and MUST be ignored on reception at the Start Point; the received Measurement Request can, therefore,
                       trivially be converted into a Measurement Reply by setting the Type (T) flag to zero.</t>

               <t>A Measurement Reply MUST be unicast back to the Start Point:<list style="symbols">
                      <t>If the Measurement Request traveled along a global DAG, identified by the RPLInstanceID field, the Measurement
                 Reply MAY be unicast back to the Start Point along the same DAG.</t>
                     <t>If the Measurement Request traveled along a Hop-by-hop Route with a local RPLInstanceID and
                 accumulated a Source Route from the Start Point to the End Point, this Source Route
                MAY be used after reversal to send the Measurement Reply back to the Start Point.</t>
                    <t>If the Measurement Request traveled along a Source Route and the R&nbsp;flag inside the received
                message is set to one, the End Point MAY reverse the Source Route contained in the Address vector
               and use it to send the Measurement Reply back to the Start Point.</t>
       </list></t>

</section>

</section>

<section anchor="processingStartPoint" title="Processing a Measurement Reply at the Start Point">

        <t>When a router receives an MO, it examines the MO to see if
one of its unicast IPv6 addresses is listed as the Start Point Address.
               If yes, the router is the Start Point and MUST process the received message in the following manner.</t>

       <t>If the Start Point discovers that the received MO is not a Measurement Reply, or if it no longer maintains state for the corresponding
              Measurement Request, it MUST discard the received message with no further processing.</t>

      <t>The Start Point can use the routing metric objects inside the Metric Container to evaluate the metrics for the measured P2P route. If a
   routing metric object contains local metric values recorded by routers on the route, the Start Point can make use of these local values
   by aggregating them into an end-to-end metric, according to the aggregation rules for the specific metric. A Start Point is then free to 
   interpret the metrics for the route, according to its local policy.</t>
     
       </section>

<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">

    <t>In general, the security considerations for the route measurement
mechanism described in this document are similar to those for RPL (as described
                in Section 19 of the RPL specification <xref
target="RFC6550"/>). Sections 6.1 and 10 of <xref target="RFC6550"/> describe RPL's security
                framework, which provides data confidentiality, authentication, replay protection, and delay protection services. This security framework
                is applicable to the route measurement mechanism described here as well, after taking into account the constraints specified in
                <xref target="secureMO"/>.</t>

        <t>This document requires that all routers participating in a secure invocation of the route measurement process use the Security Configuration chosen by
                the Start Point. The intention is to avoid compromising the overall security of the route measurement due to some routers using a weaker Security
                Configuration. A router is allowed to participate in a "secure" route measurement only if it can support the Security Configuration in use, which
                also specifies the key in use. It does not matter whether the key is preinstalled or dynamically acquired after proper authentication. The router
                must have the key in use before it can process or generate Secure MO messages. Hence, from the perspective of the route measurement mechanism, there
               is no distinction between the "preinstalled" and "authenticated"
security modes described in the RPL specification <xref target="RFC6550"/>. 
               Of course, if a compromised router has the key being used, it could cause the route measurement to fail, or worse, insert wrong information in Secure MO
               messages.</t>

       <t>A rogue router acting as the Start Point could use the route measurement mechanism defined in this document to measure routes from itself to other routers
             and thus find out key information about the LLN, e.g., the topological features of the LLN (such as the identity of the key
             routers in the topology) or the remaining energy levels <xref target="RFC6551"/> in the routers. This information can potentially be
             used to attack the LLN. A rogue router could also use this mechanism to send bogus Measurement Requests to arbitrary End Points. If sufficient
             Measurement Requests are sent, then it may cause CPU overload in the routers in the network, drain their batteries, and cause traffic congestion in
            the network. Note that some of these problems would occur even if the compromised router were to generate bogus data traffic to
              arbitrary destinations.</t>

      <t>To protect against such misuse, this document allows RPL routers implementing this mechanism to not process MO messages (or process such messages
              selectively), based on a local policy. For example, an LLN deployment might require the use of Secure MO messages generated using a key that
             could be obtained only after proper authentication. Note that this
document requires that an LLN deployment support Secure MO messages so that
              such policies can be enforced where considered essential.</t>

      <t>Since a Measurement Request can travel along a Source Route specified in the Address vector, some of the security
              concerns that led to the deprecation of Type 0 routing headers <xref target="RFC5095"/> may be valid here.
              To address such concerns, the mechanism described in this
document includes several remedies, in the form of the following requirements:
              <list style="symbols">
                      <t>A route inserted inside the Address vector must be a
strict Source Route and must not include any multicast addresses.</t>
                      <t>An MO message must not cross the boundaries of the RPL
routing domain where it originated. A router must not forward a received MO
message further if the next hop belongs to a different RPL routing domain.
Hence, any security problems associated with the mechanism would be limited
                  to one RPL routing domain.</t>
                      <t>A router must drop a received Measurement Request if
the next-hop address is not on-link or if it is not a unicast address.</t>
     </list></t>



</section>

<section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
        <t>This document defines two new RPL messages:<list style="symbols">
            <t>"Measurement Object" (see <xref target="baseMO"/>), assigned a
value of 0x06 from the "RPL Control Codes" space <xref target="RFC6550"/>.</t>

            <t>"Secure Measurement Object" (see <xref target="secureMO"/>),
assigned a value of 0x86 from the "RPL Control Codes" space <xref target="RFC6550"/>.</t>
       </list></t>

    <texttable>
        <ttcol align='center'>Code</ttcol>
        <ttcol align='center'>Description</ttcol>
        <ttcol align='center'>Reference</ttcol>
        <c>0x06</c>
        <c>Measurement Object</c>
        <c>This document</c>
        <c>0x86</c>
        <c>Secure Measurement Object</c>
        <c>This document</c>
        <postamble>RPL Control Codes</postamble>
    </texttable>
</section>

<section title="Acknowledgements">

        <t>The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Ralph Droms,
Adrian Farrel, Joel Halpern, Matthias Philipp, Pascal Thubert, Richard Kelsey,
and Zach Shelby in the development of this document.</t>

</section>

</middle>

  <back>

    <references title="Normative References">
      &RFC2119;
      &RFC4443;
      &RFC6550;
      &RFC6554;

<!-- draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl (RFC 6997) -->
<reference anchor="RFC6997">
<front>
<title>Reactive Discovery of Point-to-Point Routes in Low-Power and Lossy Networks</title>
<author initials='M' surname='Goyal' fullname='Mukul Goyal' role='editor'>
    <organization />
</author>
<author initials='E' surname='Baccelli' fullname='Emmanuel Baccelli'>
    <organization />
</author>
<author initials='M' surname='Philipp' fullname='Matthias Philipp'>
    <organization />
</author>
<author initials='A' surname='Brandt' fullname='Anders Brandt'>
    <organization />
</author>
<author initials='J' surname='Martocci' fullname='Jerry Martocci'>
    <organization />
</author>
<date month='August' year='2013' />
</front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='6997' />
</reference>

    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      &RFC5826;
      &RFC5867;
      &RFC5095;
      &RFC6551;

<!-- draft-ietf-roll-terminology (Wait for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed) -->

<reference anchor="ROLL-TERMS">
<front>
<title>Terminology in Low power And Lossy Networks</title>
<author initials='JP' surname='Vasseur' fullname='JP Vasseur'>
    <organization />
</author>
<date month='March' year='2013' />
</front>
<seriesInfo name='Work in' value='Progress'/>
</reference>

    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
