]> Qualcomm Incorporated

5775 Morehouse Drive San Diego, CA 92121-1714 US +1 858 651 4478 presnick@qti.qualcomm.com

Oracle

800 Royal Oaks Monrovia, CA 91016 USA chris.newman@oracle.com

CNNIC

No.4 South 4th Zhongguancun Street Beijing, 100190 China +86 10-58813038 shenshuo@cnnic.cn

Applications &app; Application Area Internet Engineering Task Force IMAP IDNA This specification extends the Internet Message Access Protocol version 4rev1 (IMAP4rev1) to support UTF-8 encoded international characters in user names, mail addresses, and message headers. This specification replaces RFC 5738.

This specification forms part of the Email Address Internationalization protocols described in the Email Address Internationalization Framework document. It extends IMAP4rev1 to permit UTF-8 in headers, as described in "Internationalized Email Headers" . It also adds a mechanism to support mailbox names using the UTF-8 charset. This specification creates two new IMAP capabilities to allow servers to advertise these new extensions. This specification assumes that the IMAP server will be operating in a fully internationalized environment, i.e., one in which all clients accessing the server will be able to accept non-ASCII message header fields and other information, as specified in . At least during a transition period, that assumption will not be realistic for many environments; the issues involved are discussed in below. This specification replaces an earlier, experimental approach to the same problem .

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as defined in "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" . The formal syntax uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation. In addition, rules from IMAP4rev1 , UTF-8 , , and IMAP4 list command extensions are also referenced. This document assumes that the reader will have a reasonably good understanding of these RFCs.

The "UTF8=ACCEPT" capability indicates that the server supports the ability to open mailboxes containing internationalized messages with the "SELECT" and "EXAMINE" commands, and the server can provide UTF-8 responses to the "LIST" and "LSUB" commands. This capability also affects other IMAP extensions that can return mailbox names or their prefixes, such as NAMESPACE and ACL . The "UTF8=ONLY" capability, described in , implies the "UTF8=ACCEPT" capability. A server is said to support "UTF8=ACCEPT" if it advertises either "UTF8=ACCEPT" or "UTF8=ONLY". A client MUST use the "ENABLE" command (defined in ) with the "UTF8=ACCEPT" option (defined in below) to indicate to the server that the client accepts UTF-8 in quoted-strings and supports the "UTF8=ACCEPT" extension. The "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command is only valid in the authenticated state. The IMAP4rev1 base specification () forbids the use of 8-bit characters in atoms or quoted-strings. Thus, a UTF-8 string can only be sent as a literal. This can be inconvenient from a coding standpoint, and unless the server offers IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals , this requires an extra round trip for each UTF-8 string sent by the client. When the IMAP server supports "UTF8=ACCEPT" it supports UTF-8 in quoted-strings with the following syntax:

quoted =/ DQUOTE *uQUOTED-CHAR DQUOTE ; QUOTED-CHAR is not modified, as it will affect ; other RFC 3501 ABNF non-terminals. uQUOTED-CHAR = QUOTED-CHAR / UTF8-2 / UTF8-3 / UTF8-4 UTF8-2 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629> UTF8-3 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629> UTF8-4 = <Defined in Section 4 of RFC 3629>

When this extended quoting mechanism is used by the client, then the server MUST reject, with a "BAD" response, any octet sequences with the high bit set that fail to comply with the formal syntax in . The IMAP server MUST NOT send UTF-8 in quoted-strings to the client unless the client has indicated support for that syntax by using the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command. If the server supports "UTF8=ACCEPT", the client MAY use extended quoted syntax with any IMAP argument that permits a string (including astring and nstring). However, if characters outside the US-ASCII repertoire are used in an inappropriate place, the results would be the same as if other syntactically valid but semantically invalid characters were used. Specific cases where UTF-8 characters are permitted or not permitted are described in the following paragraphs. All IMAP servers that support "UTF8=ACCEPT" SHOULD accept UTF-8 in mailbox names, and those that also support the Mailbox International Naming Convention described in RFC 3501, Section 5.1.3, MUST accept UTF8-quoted mailbox names and convert them to the appropriate internal format. Mailbox names MUST comply with the Net-Unicode Definition (, Section 2) with the specific exception that they MUST NOT contain control characters (0000-001F and 0080-009F), a delete character (007F), a line separator (2028), or a paragraph separator (2029). Once an IMAP client has enabled UTF-8 support with the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command, it MUST NOT issue a "SEARCH" command that contains a charset specification. If an IMAP server receives such a "SEARCH" command in that situation, it SHOULD reject the command with a "BAD" response (due to the conflicting charset labels).

If the server supports "UTF8=ACCEPT", then the server accepts UTF-8 headers in the "APPEND" command message argument. A client that sends a message with UTF-8 headers to the server MUST send them using the "UTF8=APPEND" data extension. If the server also advertises the CATENATE capability (as specified in ), the client can use the same data extension to include such a message in a CATENATE message part. The ABNF for the APPEND data extension and CATENATE extension follows:

utf8-literal = "UTF8" SP "(" literal8 ")" literal8 = <Defined in RFC 4466> append-data =/ utf8-literal cat-part =/ utf8-literal

If an IMAP server supports "UTF8=ACCEPT" and the IMAP client has not issued the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command, the server MUST reject, with a "NO" response, an "APPEND" command that includes any 8-bit character in message header fields.

This specification doesn't extend the IMAP "LOGIN" command to support UTF-8 usernames and passwords. Whenever a client needs to use UTF-8 username/passwords, it MUST use the IMAP "AUTHENTICATE" command, which is already capable of passing UTF-8 usernames and credentials. Although the use of the IMAP "AUTHENTICATE" command in this way makes it syntactically legal to have a UTF-8 username or password, there is no guarantee that the user provisioning system utilized by the IMAP server will allow such identities. This is an implementation decision and may depend on what identity system the IMAP server is configured to use.

The "UTF8=ONLY" capability indicates that the server supports "UTF8=ACCEPT" (see ) and that it requires support for UTF-8 from clients. In particular, this means that the server will send UTF-8 in quoted-strings, and it will not accept the older international mailbox name convention (modified UTF-7). Because these are incompatible changes to IMAP, explicit server announcement and client confirmation is necessary: clients MUST use the "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command before using this server. A server that advertises "UTF8=ONLY" will reject, with a "NO [CANNOT]" response , any command that might require UTF-8 support and is not preceded by an "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" command. IMAP clients that find support for a server that announces "UTF8=ONLY" problematic are encouraged to at least detect the announcement and provide an informative error message to the end-user. Because the "UTF8=ONLY" server capability includes support for "UTF8=ACCEPT", the capability string will include, at most, one of those and never both. For the client, "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" is always used -- never "ENABLE UTF8-ONLY".

In most situations, it will be difficult or impossible for the implementer or operator of an IMAP (or POP) server to know whether all of the clients that might access it, or the associated mail store more generally, will be able to support the facilities defined in this document. In almost all cases, servers who conform to this specification will have to be prepared to deal with clients that do not enable the relevant capabilities. Unfortunately, there is no completely satisfactory way to do so other than for systems that wish to receive email that requires SMTPUTF8 capabilities to be sure that all components of those systems -- including IMAP and other clients selected by users -- are upgraded appropriately. When a message that requires SMTPUTF8 is encountered and the client doesn't enable UTF-8 capability, choices available to the server include hiding the problematic message(s), creating in-band or out-of-band notifications or error messages, or somehow trying to create a variation on the message with the intention of providing useful information to that client about what has occurred. Such variant messages cannot be actual substitutes for the original message: they will almost always be impossible to reply to (either at all or without loss of information). The new header fields or specialized constructs for server-client communication may go beyond the requirements of, e.g., RFC 5322; they may consequently confuse some legacy mail user agents (including IMAP clients) or otherwise may not provide the expected information to users. There are also trade-offs in constructing variants of the original message between accepting complexity and additional computation costs in order to try to preserve as much information as possible (for example, in ) and trying to minimize those costs while still providing useful information (for example, in ). Implementations that choose to perform downgrading SHOULD use one of the standardized algorithms: or . Getting downgrade algorithms right, and minimizing the risk of operational problems and harm to the email system, is tricky and requires careful engineering. These two algorithms are well understood and carefully designed. Because such messages are really variations of the original ones, not really "downgraded" ones (although that terminology is often used for convenience), they inevitably have relationships to the originals that the IMAP specification did not anticipate. This brings up two concerns in particular: First, digital signatures computed over and intended for the original message will often not be applicable to the variant message, and will often fail signature verification. (It will be possible for some digital signatures to be verified, if they cover only parts of the original message that are not affected in the creation of the variant.) Second, servers that may be accessed by the same user with different clients or methods (e.g., POP or webmail systems in addition to IMAP or IMAP clients with different capabilities) will need to exert extreme care to be sure that UIDVALIDITY behaves as the user would expect. Those issues may be especially sensitive if the server caches the variant message or computes and stores it when the message arrives with the intent of making either form available depending on client capabilities. Additionally, in order to cope with the case when a server compliant with this extension returns the same UIDVALIDITY to both legacy and "UTF8=ACCEPT"-aware clients, a client upgraded from being non-"UTF8=ACCEPT"-aware MUST discard its cache of messages downloaded from the server. The best (or "least bad") approach for any given environment will depend on local conditions, local assumptions about user behavior, the degree of control the server operator has over client usage and upgrading, the options that are actually available, and so on. It is impossible, at least at the time of publication of this specification, to give good advice that will apply to all situations, or even particular profiles of situations, other than "upgrade legacy clients as soon as possible".

When an IMAP server uses a mailbox format that supports UTF-8 headers and it permits selection or examination of that mailbox without issuing "ENABLE UTF8=ACCEPT" first, it is the responsibility of the server to comply with the IMAP4rev1 base specification and with respect to all header information transmitted over the wire. The issue of handling messages containing non-ASCII characters in legacy environments is discussed in .

This document redefines two capabilities ("UTF8=ACCEPT" and "UTF8=ONLY") in the "IMAP 4 Capabilities" registry . Three other capabilities that were described in the experimental predecessor to this document ("UTF8=ALL", "UTF8=APPEND", "UTF8=USER") are now made OBSOLETE. IANA has updated the "IMAP 4 Capabilities" registry as follows:

The security considerations of UTF-8 and SASLprep apply to this specification, particularly with respect to use of UTF-8 in usernames and passwords. Otherwise, this is not believed to alter the security considerations of IMAP4rev1. Special considerations, some of them with security implications, occur if a server that conforms to this specification is accessed by a client that does not, as well as in some more complex situations in which a given message is accessed by multiple clients that might use different protocols and/or support different capabilities. Those issues are discussed in .

&rfc2119; &rfc3501; &rfc3629; &rfc4013; &rfc4466; &rfc4469; &rfc5161; &rfc5198; &rfc5234; &rfc5258; &rfc6532; &rfc5322; &rfc6530; The Email Address Internationalization (SMTPUTF8) extension to SMTP allows UTF-8 characters in mail header fields. Upgraded POP and IMAP servers support internationalized Email messages. If a POP/IMAP client does not support Email Address Internationalization, POP/IMAP servers cannot deliver Internationalized Email Headers to the client and cannot remove the message. To avoid the situation, this document describes a conversion mechanism for internationalized Email messages to be in traditional message format. In the process, message elements requiring internationalized treatment are recoded or removed and receivers are able to know that they received messages containing such elements even if they cannot process the internationalized elements. This document specifies a method for IMAP and POP servers to serve internationalized messages to conventional clients. The specification is simple, easy to implement and provides only rudimentary results. &rfc2088; &rfc5738; &rfc2342; &rfc4314; &rfc5530;

This non-normative section discusses the reasons behind some of the design choices in this specification. The basic approach of advertising the ability to access a mailbox in UTF-8 mode is intended to permit graceful upgrade, including servers that support multiple mailbox formats. In particular, it would be undesirable to force conversion of an entire server mailstore to UTF-8 headers, so being able to phase in support for new mailboxes and gradually migrate old mailboxes is permitted by this design. The "UTF8=ONLY" mechanism simplifies diagnosis of interoperability problems when legacy support goes away. In the situation where backwards compatibility is not working anyway, "just-send-UTF-8 IMAP" has the advantage that it might work with some legacy clients. However, the difficulty of diagnosing interoperability problems caused by a "just-send-UTF-8 IMAP" mechanism is the reason the "UTF8=ONLY" capability mechanism was chosen.

The authors wish to thank the participants of the EAI working group for their contributions to this document, with particular thanks to Harald Alvestrand, David Black, Randall Gellens, Arnt Gulbrandsen, Kari Hurtta, John Klensin, Xiaodong Lee, Charles Lindsey, Alexey Melnikov, Subramanian Moonesamy, Shawn Steele, Daniel Taharlev, and Joseph Yee for their specific contributions to the discussion.